Skip Navigation

Journal of Design History 1997 10(2):137-160; doi:10.1093/jdh/10.2.137
© 1997 by Design History Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COOKE, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Beauty as a Route to ‘the Radiant Future’: Responses of Soviet Architecture

CATHERINE COOKE

The Open University


   Abstract

This article seeks to probe behind the verbal criteria in which the brief for a Socialist Realist architecture was defined under Stalin in order to identify specific design features that were considered successfully to embody them. In particular, it examines the Communist Party's demand that Soviet buildings and urban forms should be svetloe (radiant), and hence materialize the svetloe budushchee (radiant future) which the Party was promising its citizens.

In defending the Soviet profession of the time against superficial and dismissive judgements by certain recent historians, the article shows the importance of getting closer to the real design oeuvre of Soviet architects at that date (the early 1930s to Stalin's death and the early 1950s) through their more ephemeral (hence now rare) periodicals, and of evaluating these design propositions in relation to the actual theoretical and critical criteria which were shaping them at the time, rather than by later external assumptions about those criteria.

It examines the role of monumental artists in creating the fully expressive architectural work which Socialist Realism demanded, and the role of architectural and planning historians in establishing what it meant to be ‘national in form’ in the Russian context.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.