Skip Navigation

Journal of Design History 1998 11(3):217-233; doi:10.1093/jdh/11.3.217
© 1998 by Design History Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAYWARD, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

‘Good design is largely a matter of common sense’: Questioning the Meaning and Ownership of a Twentieth-Century Orthodoxy

STEPHEN HAYWARD

London


   Abstract

This article has two main objectives the methodological enrichment of Design History, and the application of these perspectives to a central issue within the history of design—the ‘good design’ discourse.

In response to the ‘Post-Modern dilemma’—what to study?—Part One considers how in particular circumstances objects may be regarded as forms of cultural discourse. It is a perspective well established in material culture studies and museology where Foucault's idea that discursive artefacts operate as knowledge and involve the exercise of power has been highly influential In contrast much recent work on the history and theory of consumption has emphasized the positive aspects of cultural discourse—its ability to empower the individual and to facilitate self-representation In reconciling these positions I introduce Bourdieu's concept of ‘habitus’ or taste culture, an idea that allows a consideration of subjectivity in terms of the appropriation and modification of knowledge in accordance with distinctive circumstances

Part Two focuses on the ‘good design’ discourse I define this as a collection of axioms that were especially prominent in the 1930s and the post-war period In the field of public rhetoric it presented itself as ‘common sense’ However, I argue that it was a partial and Elitist form of knowledge in so far as it positioned itself in opposition to an idea of ‘mass’ culture When introduced to the market-place, ‘good design’ became ‘good taste’, taking on associations that were generic to particular commodity types I base my analysis on Heal's inter-war marketing strategy In order to reconstruct a consumer perspective on this commodified knowledge I examine the Mass Observation Report on the ’Britain Can Make It‘ exhibition of 1946.

Key Words: consumption • design industry • Great Britain • methodology • Modernism • representation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.