Skip Navigation

Journal of Design History 1999 12(1):65-79; doi:10.1093/jdh/12.1.65
© 1999 by Design History Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CLARKE, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Managing Design: The Art and Colour Section at General Motors, 1927–1941

SALLY CLARKE

University of Texas at Austin Texas


  Abstract

This essay investigates industrial design as a business risk. I study General Motors (GM), a firm claiming so much power by 1941 that one might assume it faced no risks. But as Harley Earl styled vehicles as smooth, streamlined images of steel, GM managers wrestled with uncertainties about consumers' tastes, the technology for manufacturing car bodies, and the task of judging designers who as creative individuals defied ‘rational’ management. GM effectively dealt with its styling risks as it dominated the largest consumer market. Still, compared to the Cord 810, GM cars were not necessarily the most fashionable or innovative autos on US highways

Key Words: automobiles • business management • consumers • industrial design • risk • United States


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.