Skip Navigation

Journal of Design History 1999 12(3):217-239; doi:10.1093/jdh/12.3.217
© 1999 by Design History Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PUETZ, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Design Instruction for Artisans in Eighteenth-Century Britain

ANNE PUETZ


   Abstract

In England from the 1730s onwards, demands were increasingly made for the improvement of the design of nationally manufactured goods. Improved design was regarded as an essential prerequisite to the ability to compete on equal terms with rival, and especially French, producers of luxury goods. Proponents of such improvements tended to concentrate their efforts on the provision of drawing instruction for artisans, and a variety of schemes for the establishment of a public educational body for the ‘arts of design’ were (unsuccessfully) put forward. In the absence of an official policy and institution with control over design education for the applied arts, the ‘market’ stepped in to satisfy the need for instruction (in the form of private drawing schools and a variety of differently motivated publications including drawing and model books, treatises and engraved ornament), and provided the forum for debate. Two distinct periods (the 1740s–1768 with a sub-period of the 1750s–1763, and post-1768 to the early decades of the nineteenth century) and the respective industries of greatest contemporary concern or visibility (textiles, woodcarving and furniture, furniture and interior decoration) serve as the basis for a more detailed analysis of the different drawing skills that were taught in the period, as well as of the various, and at times contending, meanings of the term ‘design’.

Key Words: crafts • design education • division of labour • draughtsmanship • foliage studies • national competitiveness


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.