Skip Navigation

Journal of Design History 2003 16(2):103-117; doi:10.1093/jdh/16.2.103
© 2003 by Design History Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edginton, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Design of Moral Architecture at The York Retreat1

Barry Edginton

University of Winnipeg


   Abstract

Both institutional and architectural history places the asylum alongside the prison and the workhouse, whose design characteristics emphasize confinement and control. this connectin obfuscates important differences in how ideas about treatment were reflected in particular architectural design. In other words, there have been few attempts to understand how the physical structure of the asylum became part of its medical discourse, and no attempts to research the treatment programme evolving as a result of the designers' intentions and becoming part of the asylum's architecture. Every researcher working in the field of the history of asylum's acknowledgements the importance of the York Retreat an its policy of ‘moral treatment’ in influencing the course of nineteenth-century asylum construction. Since the investigation, the influece of The Retreat needs to be evaluatedin light of the research. This article will focus on the correspondence between the founder of The York Retreat. William tuke, and its architect, John Bevans. I will present their discussions on the design of The Retreat within the context of their perceptions of insanity and their beliefs in ‘moral treatment’ to show how the intentionality of design is realized in architectural form.

Key Words: architecture • design • Great Britain • insinity • representation


1A version of this paper was presented at the Sixth Annual Hannah International Conference on the History of Mental Illness in Toronto, 2001. I would like to acknowledge the support of the Hannah Institute and the Borthwick Institute for Historical Research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.